vLLM and SGLang are both high-performance serving projects, but the practical choice depends on the workload you intend to operate. A simple chat endpoint, a high-concurrency retrieval pipeline and an agent with structured multi-step generation can stress different parts of a serving stack.
The projects’ own descriptions make a sensible starting point: vLLM focuses on high-throughput, memory-efficient model serving, while SGLang positions itself as a serving framework for language and multimodal models. Those claims are not a substitute for a production test on your model, hardware, context length and traffic shape.
Benchmark the whole request path. Include tokenization, queueing, caching, tool-call patterns, observability and failure recovery—not merely generated tokens per second. The correct choice is the one your team can run, instrument and update reliably after the first benchmark chart has stopped being interesting.